不眠症のブログを楽しんで|ファミリーは、死の床のイメージが終了して喫煙を引き起こす期待している

家族が終了希望死の床に画像が喫煙者が原因

による管理の下で12月31日、2010年に面白いフラッシュになっているもの：

更新日：木2010年12月30日20時32分12秒

CTV.caのニューススタッフ

タバコのパッケージにラベルを警告の新シリーズで取り上げている癌患者の家族が写真oを期待している fは彼女の死の床で彼女の虚弱身体が点灯してから人々を落胆されます。

pの無線LANは、木曜日には、オタワでより大きく、よりグラフィック警告を展開しています発表更新作業は喫煙者が出てお尻と落胆非喫煙者は、esをやる気にさせる pecially代、習慣をとること。

たばこ会社はジを余儀なくされるスプレイのラベル - そこare16すべての - それは、各パッケージの75％を占めます。現在の要件 50％です。

ラベルとキャプションのより多くの種類を特色にするが、写真は、ほとんどのありのままのいずれかの42歳のバーブターボックス柱の撮影した画像です 2003年に彼女の死の前世紀日。

ターボックス、あちこちによく知られている抗タバコ十字軍メートルエドモントンは、喫煙の有効期間の後にがんのため死亡した。彼女の夫、パットとレーガdaug hter彼女の継続を彼女のマッケンジーは考えて警告を含めることをで cyの。

"（ラベルがあります）それに良いショック因子。ショックそれがなら、私は少数の人々に衝撃を与えるだろう"とパットターボックスはCTVを語った。 "うまくいけば、それはsh および/終了したりしないの開始にそれらをocks。"

癌と闘っている間、ターボックス、最終的なカ月を費やして多くの指示タバコ製品を使用しないように人々を奨励し、彼女の人生のnths 若い人たちに向かって彼女の努力。

マッケンジーターボックスは、カナダというメッセージをphot oは幸せな彼女が重要なの母は、提供など、彼女の。

"いくつかのプライドはそこだと彼女のメッセージは、これらの写真のように起こっている、それだけで彼女が死んだとき、停止していない"と彼女は言った。

ターボックスの写真と一緒に伴われるキャプション次："これは肺癌の死亡ものであるように見えます。バーブターボックスは、lの42で死んだ喫煙によるがん光雄。"

新しい警告が有効であることを確認するために、彼らはrewritをされている簡単な言語で10色やグラフィックディーアールすることを意図して提示人々へのメッセージホームアイブ。

"カナダおよび国際的な研究がctive effeすることが示すように、タバコのパッケージに健康に関する警告は、思い出に残る必要がありますが目立つ。ザ yはまた、信じられないと関連しなければならない"と保健大臣レオナAglukkaqはオタで記者団に府。

Aglukkaqは、メッセージと述べた極としてタバコのパッケージに表示されるのが警告がすぐにすい回路とする彼らは敏感に喫煙を続ける回転する。

批評家彼らが持っていないされて変化を年10 dのためrgue有効性を、失われた電流は警告ラベルが。カナダはタバコのグラフィック警告を配置する最初の国だったパッケージは、多くの国で得られたスーツを次。

ガーフィールドマフードファイル、exe 非喫煙者の権利協会のcutive監督は、広告が費用対効果の高いていると言いました彼らはうまく動作します。

"それは納税者に一銭も費用がかからない、業界ではdの変化のコストを吸収する率直に言って大きさではないが、ESIGNは、"マフードは、CTVのニュースチャンネルを語った。

トブのアコ帝国スポークスマンはのlabellその旨の75％を制御して、政府は、そのパッケージにINGの虐待です。

Aglukkaqは、政府がヘルに取り組んでいますだ pingを500万人以上のカナダ人は、推定を殺す習慣を喫煙をやめるカナダでは37000人に、それぞれのTED。

オタワは、若い人々を防止したいと思っているから喫煙を開始する。

新しい警告ラベルに加えて、政府は一終了するよ導入電話ホットラインやウェブサイト方法についてmationをインフォアへgetを使用することができます喫煙者が。

CTVのカルガリーのKaren Owenさんからのレポートで

コメントはためのものです閉じて今 rをこの物語は、

して、Bev
どのようなお金の無駄..政府はGで喫煙者を助ける必要があります彼らに禁煙をiving彼らはnicodermパターンの価格を減らすことによって、必要な支援チズとチャンピックスが安い..自分がpictur喫煙者いるかのような製品を作る死にかけている人や醜い口ショットのesはないHELP.peopleゴーイングトゥ再終了...かわりを施し。。グリップをする政府pple取得します。ウェイクアップ地獄交流

大きく税喫煙
それはばかだっぽい、不自然な、あなたの体に有毒な煙を吸う。彼らの権利念頭に置いて誰も人はこれまでタバコをかかる合理的な責任ある態度でこれを探します。我々は、この邪悪なものの我々の社会を取り除く必要があります。喫煙者を介して払う必要がないそれ自体は、後で面倒を見て医療費のためにたばこを購入する。

Concerned_Citizen
タバコのパッケージに配置するグラフィックイメージに役立つとしている人は人を奨励する抗議の兆候での喫煙についてだけでなく、グラフィック写真を停止する中絶を持っていない選択してください。それはばかげている！政府はまったくされている場合喫煙者の健康に関わる、彼らは製品を禁止する。彼らは、n個の選択彼らはsmオフに数百万ドル、数百万を作っているようにotの製品を禁止する okers。タバコにはまっていない人は、mを実行して問題がない私たちの健康保険制度からの喫煙を禁止するのouths。同じ医療はSy支払う幹が喫煙者が。同じ健康保険制度が私たちの政府はrを unsのはsmokers.Weから数百万ドルを集めながら、すべての今を認識Oのさ fはどのように危険でどのくらいの喫煙は全員に影響を与えます。方法については代わりに、スペン私たちは、お金を新しいパッケージに何百万ドルを費やす鼎同僚と喫煙者を支援するやめるのSTS。

イヴァンH
私は大きな画像は、平均喫煙者に喫煙をやめることはしないと思います、それはしている禁煙をする人までが、必ずそれを作るかもしれないが、それをですが、それについて考える yは別のものを点灯し、それについて考えるので、私の意見では、これは単なるanothです政府は、彼らがする必要がないことにお金を費やしている小胞体の方法は、タバコはbと同じように有効ですが、 EER方式は、例のアルコールによる事故の写真を入れてビール会社が表示されないuは、さ。

スーザンブラウン
現実には、これらの広告は、作業を行うことです。私はsmok終了これらの広告のため数年前にINGの私は生活の中で良いのを感じたことがない。ですから、その否定している人のため...殺す...一番下の行...禁煙をあきらめるな！はm yは叔母と私の母は、喫煙が原因で肺がんで亡くなった絶対にない何も見て人々は肺癌で死ぬよりも悪い。それは最悪だ！そのため、PAの間私の愛する人、これらの広告は...の歌うはI'm無料喫煙と私はいい気分だ

来る
私は、定期的にニュースを見るそれらを販売する単純な停止はですノースダコタ州と思うオペアンプ喫煙を私は、st場合、そこに彼らが望ん人がいる場合であり、"ワンマネー"政府は、もので、与えられたパターンである。彼らは明らかに、購入するなかった場合、私は喫煙私woul 何をしたdn'tは、コストをダブルされ、うーむ、私は"お金"何が疑問に思う。それは、pできれば、例えば、marijunaを取る rofitable、彼らはおそらく、それを販売するが、それは合法的にそれを販売することは困難だろうと、私はタバコ農家の多くは、そこには想像できない人々はそれを成長させる彼らが協力をさせて市場をrneredなぜですか？それは"お金"についてです。それは、yaの気分が良くなる場合が私の意見では、上のラベルを付けるかどうすれば俺から、それを愛し、古い強大なドルは、まだ最優先になると思うちなみに、ファーストフードの確立のためのすべてのラベルは、単にーーーーーここでと思いました。

して、Jonathan Coote
私は驚いて、深く悲しんでカナダに置くように喫煙と追加警告ラベルに多くのenfacesのIGN完全中繰り返し試行なoringアルコールにラベルを警告が表示されます。私は鉄で生まれたタルアルコールスペクトラム障害は、不治の障害は母体によってのみ発生妊娠中の飲酒。アルコール損害について、一切の治療法は私が生まれる前はありません。私の神経系へのダメージ、私の脳、私の免疫システムが、一定の痛み、李 stは点灯します。治療法はないが、100％妊娠中の飲酒しないことで予防できる。私カーウァイ日アルコールtはラベルを警告しています。

メル
支配する場合、私が知っているのが大好きだメンターは、人々は、喫煙を終了するために、取得と判定される場合、なぜ、彼らはタバコcompan後に行っていない新設？？？なぜ、我々は何かが違法やっているようにも扱われる必要があります、政府のために働く多くの人々は、喫煙者のですか？彼らはそれを認めることもでしょうか？か。肝心なのは、消費者を罰する停止するには、我々はすべてのストアとpurchaに移動されそれ自体一法的な製品です。

サンドラ
OMGのは何でしょう誰もがSMOを終了した場合、政府が行う王は、彼らが税金からお金がないでしょう。私dontは、これらの写真はmと思う diffenceをオーケ。私はそれがないなら、私は赤ちゃんを持つことができたように吸って終了私の夫は私がビートでの喫煙に行くと、それを好きではないという事実は、写真は私にも気いけない。

また、なぜいけない私たちは、cと肝臓の写真を入れあまりにもビールやliqourボトルirrhosis。飲み物は残念だ。

マーリン
喫煙は、訴えるメキシコ麻薬カルテルにはまったく関連性を持っています。このような提案にridiです culous。これは、市場からタバコを取るには全く論理的なアプローチになるここに処方only.Theキーによって、既存の喫煙者に、彼らが利用できるように禁煙の普及と効果があつた日にすべてのステップを停止することです。

T revor
政府は人々が喫煙を停止するが、彼らは百万円を自慢したい彼らはタバコから持って税金の掲載。それは誰かowniようなものだお菓子屋さんのng、彼らはそれが歯に悪いので、お菓子を食べてはいけないことを人々に伝えるが、彼らはスティル lは、あなたが来て、彼らはお金を稼ぐことができるので、お菓子を買ってほしい。確認するには、長時間のストーリー短い。誰がGovenmetは、だましていると思いますか！

クリス
はい、私も午前喫煙者。政府のための私のsuggetion自由のための人々に"ストップ喫煙デバイス"を提供することです。ザもしかしたらnは、いくつかは、終了するつもりだと長い目で見れば、それはトン助けることができる医療システムのドレインを減少させるòができます。

リザ
私は、政府が取得だと思う tingと愚かなばかげて何人かの人々は、演技は、喫煙し、そのする自由は、Jさんあなたのいくつかはなぜ人タバコを支払う人がトイレに必要があることをご希望ウスチ kのものではない政府のIF快適な実際に重要な人々の健康を、彼らは禁止することができますかたばこしかし、我々はすべてのITが十分のお金は、私が十分に言われたからだが不可能だと知っている
それら以外の喫煙者はあなたが自由を持っても喫煙者にいくつかのスペースを与える

トレイシー
再び我々グラム overnment、私たちのお金を無駄にしたいと考えています。私はそれが廃棄物になると思います。人々はヘクタールになるまたはrdenedもしばらくすると、写真を魅了した。他の多くのコメントとして為すが言った。なぜ政府は飲酒運転でより多くのダメージをしないのですか？私はT その後、タバコを持つ少数の人々に大きな問題であることをヒンク。

Stefさん
方法についてはラベルがだホーム何もしない開始..の、教育、...教育教育で、ラボ）人工湖の背景エルスさんは"これは、首脳会談の税金に行くときにタバコを吸って"（G8の場所です！

して、Nikki
サラ：カームがダウンして...私は看護師を"神"ではない。私がする個人的には何もしなかった彼不良としてalthcareシステムはそのまま... ...あなたのようなsheesh.Soundsは、独自の問題を持っている。私のコメントは、すべてから来ている私は喫煙のための日常的な死を参照してください例。

グレン
と思う、それは可能性があります 2％ドロップ販売。グラフィックイメージは、いくつかの時期にされている。しかし、少なくともನ％の販売たばこが密輸されます。

スティーブ
コーティスのロバート。
あなたは人々がwhと思いますか regulatrベースで中毒にOのドリンクは、健康車から禁止されるべき電子システム？あなたは、肝臓癌の聞いたことがあるようにはしていない？彼らがどのようにか、また、医療保険制度に大きな汚れをしているケンタッキーフライドチキンのような食事をガブガブ飲むの脂肪と肥満の人は、ダブルダウンとOT 彼女のファーストフードは、それらは開発の健康システムディから禁止されるべき abetese？またはどのように事故で過失がされ、その人自身を傷つける人々それは自分の愚かなせいだったからだと言うと、彼らが、医療の助けを得ることが必要 peedingやテキストメッセージ、運転中？私は4親戚、それらのものではないことはPU、がんで死ぬ見てきた医療制度を拒否治療taの歪み、痛みの永吉のIV以外数千のシステムdを排水最後の日またはその人生の中の2はまだ私は、人々見てきたLERの外傷を頭部と苦しんで深刻なのallars搭乗スケートのことをのような不要なこと愚かなダウン階段飛行の。彼はまだシステムをdraingだと遺言の残りのための彼のライフ！私たちも彼を切断ですか？

して、Cindy
残念なことに、我々は彼らの周りの人々に住んで世界や自分自身について気peのかだけでなく、オプレ。だ親したがって、子供の秒針の喫煙とincrは作る（自分の子供を回避モーク）には、喫煙を開始することの可能性を容易にします。若い大人の週末を取得酔っのEV eryの。社会が悪い食べて、自分の体重を増加させる... ...人々に感謝されていないfをまたは、健康で生きているので、自分自身を破壊される。したがって、すべてのコメント写真を見て、それらに影響しないことを言って、このページの人。あなたに恥を知れ。はいdは rinkingと薬を服用し、食べ過ぎも中毒です...私はそれらのいずれかに同意しない私はどちらも行っている... 27歳の女性としてノースダコタ州私は健康であること愛しているから、生命トンを愛して自分を害することも多し。このアドオンは、喫煙に焦点をしようとしている...我々は、それをすべきではないので、 ITは殺してしまう。だけの世界は、生命の価値について気にできれば... ... （psの...そうであっても健康な人が死ぬことができた病気の...なぜあなたのチャンスを減少させるようにしたらどうだ？）

Anonm
警告は何もしません。なし以上 "喫煙はあなたを殺すことができる"とか"あなたは何を食べて、気を付けろ、過度の脂肪、それはあなたの静脈を詰まらせていただきます"誰かを伝える。私は、4ヶ月以上前に喫煙をやめるそれは番目のラベルとは何の関係もあったを購入する。私の母は私を停止することをしなかったもdが死亡した、前に癌年4。私は3つの子供であり、夫が非喫煙、andthatは私を停止していない。何が喫煙から私を停止？はlに私の欲求炎神煙。それだけです。私は私が望んでいないため、14年間吸って - 私がいたのではまっています。それだけで4ショートヶ月されましたが、私は喫煙に行く想像することはできません。私は自由喫煙されています。

オタワは禁煙から人々をdeterrしたい場合は、ここでのアイディアです：彼らは違法な！ governm entの煙が"いけない偽善的であるように！が、または何かなどをため、その生成に我々は禁止文句を言わないお金私たちのために多くの"...それは嫌です。どちらかに、または反対している。ていないのさなかにある。

ポール
うーむ、37000皆さんは、各いや死ぬたばこからrは一人は、喫煙かんなで死亡したが、それでもbutts.And BISは、この画像EHのとsumpthinのチョロン！何GWはハーパーズ知事はそれを試合を行ってジュ灘は！彼は、雑草が高い力、ブーズでここに置かれたより多くの刑務所を構築したいと考えてとasprinsの男がした。

New Brunswickのラルフ渦
神ために！みんながクレイジー？ジャスト及びそれらの販売を停止問題を超えています！！私が今まで目の宝くじを獲得した場合私は、STOP売れたたばこCAMPANE私のたくさんのお金を費やすことになる。

リース
@はロバートが... ...'明示的な警告は、喫煙を停止するには何もしません、それだけでfluff.Education"良い感じ"だのみです答えです。すべての喫煙者は、システムの健康を公開することが禁止されてから- "ええ、その後、我々はrをafteすることができますに行くと車の道を、食品、汚染人がビールをあまり消費と、誰もが病気に作っているもちろん、それだけであなたはベンを享受することがままになるほとんどの人は文句を言わないので、免除の対象と社会的プログラムのifits 必然的にyを残して完全な崩壊につながるするに支払うことからエド ouは自分でかわすため。

トロ
よくやった。彼らは今、同じWiを始める必要がありますすべてのアルコール飲料番目の

マージ
応答は日記に
我々は、dを十分に我々の税金を支払っている医療システムからより良い治療をeserve。我々は、25年前には$ 2パック支払わ今、私たちは、自分自身と恩恵を$ 12しない数学支払う医療から抜け出す field cuz I'd hate to have you assist me with an attitude like that. Go help the old folks in a home or something where they might appreciate your services. Sad that health c are 'professionals' can criticise the patients like that. tsk tsk

Will
Time to involk the 7th and 8th freedo ms: 7. The freedom to mind your own damn business. 8。 the freedom to go to hell in your own way. People make choices, some are good some are bad. That is their perogative. Everyone else can mind their own busness. And NO I am NOT a smoker.

BJ
With a # of recent accident deaths caused by the TTC does this mean we shou ldnt ride the TTC anymore. ？ sounds like it to me.

Marge
Re;Me's comment-You are absolutely right and ar e onto something. Let's do that, make the public see what drinking and driving does to bodies of the people who are killed in them. That would be a great deterrant for any st upid person who decides to drive drunk, at least smokers harm themselves alone a nd not the whole community they live in when they light up. Great point! Love it Me….way to go I love that one. I'ma smoker too and have taught my kids different, i don't put them in harms way and have a smoke free home and car. Addiction is being labelled a disease now people, we need help not lectures or “education” from grotesque photo's.

art
Another conservative flip-flop.

Richard in New Brunswi ck
I smoked for 35 years – a little less than a pack a day. At age 50, the cost went from silly to ridiculous with extra taxes. I decided to quit. That lasted about 3 months a nd then I was back at it. One day I calculated I'd spent the cash price of a brand new Honda A ccord on cigarettes during my lifetime and that went from ridiculous to just pla in stupid. I decided to quit. This time, rather than cold turkey, I make a few r ules. Rule #1 – no smoking ever indoors – office or home. That cut my consumption in half immediately. And f rom half a pack a day to nothing was not easy but it was a lot easier than from a full pack to nothing. As others have said, YOU CAN DO IT… but you've got to really want to. Otherwise forg et trying to quit. With these new “collectable” packages, start a card swap club with your dying friends lik e you did with baseball/hockey cards… might as well have some fun on your way out.

Daniel Fro m Toronto
@me, ok now thats just ridiculous, now you would like pictures putting bloody gorey scene's of what people with broken legs? Cars wrapped around telephone poles? Not all people who drink alcohol drink it to get stupid and then make the most idio tic choice of driving while intoxicated. It is just a lapse in judgement that ha ppens way to often. Smoking Kills more then Stupid Alcoholics ever would.

Jumbo Smokes
What a farce. Just make cigarettes bigger and more graphic. So big they w on't fit in the average suicidal sucking smokers mouth. Maybe that would discourage smokers. のM ake them so big, you need oral surgery to fit it in your mouth! Let's find out who really, rea lly wants to smoke 'em. Governments 'tinkering' with taxes, scary pictures. Next they'll be telling you that BB gun is going to shoot so meone's eye out.

TG- Winnipeg
Although I support that anti-smoking idea being taken here, Im a lso with the others. This does nothing and means nothing for smokers. It wont ma ke them more likely to quit. The best course of action I think needs to be taken is keep jacking up the price more and more. I know people still buy them, but f or young people (such as teenagers) it makes it unaffordable for them, and there fore forces them to cut back, or cut the habit altogether before it becomes an a ddiction.

Zack in BC to to Robert
See the main problem with what you say is kick the people out of the health care system who pay for the system and a lot more by purchasing smokes. Do you not relise if you were to just ban smokes, they'll raise taxes ev erywhere else to pay for the health care system and whatever else goes into a de ficit. So before you go shooting your mouth off, how about doing some research.

Wrex
Dear Non-Smokers: While it's well and good for you to want to ban cigarettes, or refuse s mokers the free healthcare system of Canada, chew on this for a while – who do you think funds the most of it, by purchasing cigarettes? Cigarettes, as we all know, are taxed heavily – and the government loves those tax dollars. As others have said, I would like to se e some type of warning label on alcohol as well – what it does to one's liver if it's abused, horrible crashes resulting f rom drinking and driving, etc. (The warning labels on cigarettes by the way are completely ignored and a waste of time, btw) – but if you're going to target cigarettes, you better target a lcohol too – they're both addictive substances, and deserve equal attention.

BC in BC
Choose your poison. ミ ne is smoking. Other people will choose liquor, drugs or foods to curb their cra vings. I don't drink, do drugs and I watch my diet and exercise regularly. This is my choice. Some people will operate vehicles when their faculties are deminished because of their poisons. Other people will complain to the airline industry because their fat a$$es won't fit in the seat and forced to pay for the extra seat. Diabetes healthcare cos ts in Canada will top $6.6 B this year in Canada. Putting images on a pack wont make any difference. I dont see it anymore. But please be fair to all with warni ng labels/images on wine and beer bottles, chocolate bars, fast foods packaging.

old_dave
Is there no one besides myself that doesn't see the typical government mentality her e ?The cigarettes are hidden away from public view people !By the time you see t he new pictures, you've already bought the pack !I for one, will not show any of my non-smokin g friends and colleagues any of the new pictures, unless they buy a smoke from m e.It's my own personal rebellion.

KristyThibodeau
It's against the LAW To smoke in cars anyways and, To drin k and drive and, People are still doing it.May be the government should close do wn the tobacco company's and, Save money on something else, Like making new jail houses for pe ople who like drinking and driving !!

SLN
The problem with kicking smokers off t he health care system (as some posters are suggesting) is that it's a knee-jerk reaction that begs the question, where do we stop? We'll have to also kick out the drinkers, the drug addict s, those who eat too many hamburgers, too few vegetables, don't comply with doctor's orders, reckless driver s, skydivers, etc etc etc. Our health care system doesn't work that way, and if we want to sta rt picking and choosing who we cover we will soon look like the USA. No thanks!

マーク
As a smoker I can honestly tell you that any changes made to the packages w ill have little or no effect on me,or any other smoker,yeah I know its bad for m e,but I look at alot of ppl I know,who have quit smoking only to see them develo p asthma,or COPD,.Why doesn't the government spend the money on more useful things,like hea lth care,education,job training,no they'd rather waste it on mediocre bsI seriously get tick ed off at ppl who have never smoked a day in their lives,telling me to quit..min d your own business,I agree with 1 person on here..starting putting graphic pict ures on alcohol bottles of car wrecks,I see more and more ppl in this country dy ing from fatal accidents due to drinking and driving than someone smoking a ciga rette…your priorities are in the wrong place.

Peter R
LoLyeah right oh well the kids will now have new trading cards like the last time.If they are so worried why are they le gal.Remember the ad's about chemicals in smokes ? Am I the only one that thought “Why does the government al low those lethal chemicals be used in cigarettes in the first place !!!”they will never give u p though because the more they lose the higher the taxes will be cus they lose t oo much money every time they talk a smoker into a non smoker.Right now they mak e more money on cigarettes then the company's that make them in the name of healthcare which t hey are cutting every year.so where is that money going ???

Robert in Courtice
T he explicit warnings do NOTHING to stop smoking,it's just “feel good” fluff.Education is the only answer.Every smoker shou ld be banned from the public health system.Why should the rest of us pay for smo ker's stupidity.Product liability is another area we need to investigate.It forced auto compan ies to comply with health and safety standards,why are tobacco compnaies any dif ferent? Oh,wait.Should the tobacco industry go broke,the government would loose too much tax revenue.Right,I get it,now.

Ian Ottawa
My mother smoked two packs a day of Kool or Craven A. She said she would quit when cigarettes reached a doll ar. Her five children went without milk or bread but not a day went by that she went without her addiction. The only way she quit was after she died.Emphyzema a nd tubes throughout the house weren'ta deterrent either. I doubt pictures would have helped.I've never and will never smoke and people that do, Just Don't Get It. And won't.Let them have our health care suffer becau se of it. As far as I see it, if You suffer from smoking illnesses then You pay for them in the end by yourself.

私
Well……that's fine me. And I'ma smoker.But I would be very happy if pictures of deadly accidents cau sed by alcohol abuse would also be put on bottles.Each year about 15.000 people die from alcohol abuse related car accidentsThe weird thing is that any governme nt doesn't have any problems with receiving taxes from tobacco sales…….

Charles Regina
Keith is absolutely right! As an ex -smoker, i was only able to quit because of my will power. I tried patches, gum with no luck. I started tracking how and when my cravings occured, and began not icing how nicotine warped my decisions. I was able to quit, and after 3 months, and still to this day, i have not had a single craving. Tobacco used to be grown in rotation with hemp, because tobacco depletes the soils nutrients where as he mp would replenish them. After hemp was banned, new chemicals had to be developp ed to grow tobacco, and that is the problem. We're poisoning an already poisonous plant. フォース ALL TOBACCO GROWERS TO USE ORGANIC INPUTS. Growing costs would go up because yi elds would go down.

Daniel From Toronto
It seems that most comments are coming f rom people who care about people smoking but way care way more about people eati ng. Not disagreeing or agreeing here but whatever people decide to do with thems elves is THERE CHOICE!. We have no right to decide for others besides our Childr en. Just for the political nut jobs out their. A) i dont smoke. B) im not obese or have diabietes, But I believe in free will. But honestly most smokers or smok ers to be will not look at these pictures and give a damn anyways.

Sara
Dear Nik ki:

If the healthcare workers, doctors and surgeons in this country were not cha rging such exorbitant rates for their services in the first place, the governmen t would not need to allocate over 50% of taxes this province pays to healthcare. 85 % of the total healthcare bill is on salaries alone. There is way to much ab use on the part of all of you that has created this financial disaster in health care. Healthcare is the author of it's own misfortune not the people using and paying for the system. You people just keep wanting more and more to do less and less. Until th e government deals with the real source of the problem it will never change but keep getting worse. You blame ciggerettes and obesity and everything else under the sun for high costs to take attention away from the real reasons behind it. T he problem is that alot more people on this earth are realizing you are not the gods you profess to be. More and more people are realizing you know far less abo ut the human body and how it functions than your so called scientists have been leading the masses to beleive in the past. The public is wising up – your grasping at anything you can now to maintain your over inflated salaries. Smokers are not the proble m – the incredible greed of the healthcare field is the sole problem.

Jat Illan
I beg to diffe r with those who say this form of packaging is useless.Yes, it might be useless for those who are already smokers, and are addicted to the nicotine.Yet, it may be a more effective tool, to that highschool kid who buys his first pack to feel cool. It might make him reconsider.Those who say oh what about all those fatty foods, what is the government going to do about that?Honestly, government is not your mom or dad. Cigarettes is a problem for everyone because of its second han d smoking, and its effects that people may not know it has on their body.A sensi ble human being with minimum common sense, will know that eating a hamburger twi ce the size of your face is no good. At least it doesn't directly harm those around you while you stuff your face

Redneck Vic
More people are killed and more families effec ted by drinking than smoking so what are we doing about the drink? ナッシング！ I fi nd it rather ironic that we do not allow smoking in arenas or restaurants but we allow drinking of alcohol where kids are allowed! funny flash websites is it no トン？

Sheila
When are they gonna get it … the warnings on the packages have zero effect … the whole package cou ld be a graphic picture and the only people repelled are already non-smokers.

番目の is is tokenism in the extreme as it cost nothing for the government to force the makers of cigarettes to change their packaging … funding smoking cessation clinics would be f ar more productive and might show some results.

Doug in Alberta
You can put pict ures all you want across the packages but it will not help one bit. I am suppris ed they are not putting labels on liquor bottles and beer cases of car crashes d ue to drinking and driving but again if one thinks that will stop drinking and d riving you are wrong. The only way to stop cig. deaths is pull them from the she lves and stop selling them. If you want to stop drinking and driving, ban alcoho l and you all know that will never happen. Good luck, but pictures do not help

マーク
Eating a bacon-double-cheeseburger will kill you faster than smoking a cigar ette,so why no labels on a burger?

Go Barb Go
I applaud Barb Tarbox for all of h er efforts as I can't imagine what it would feel like to travel day in and day out to speak fe eling like you were dying inside. Her family is doing the right thing by fulfill ing her wishes.
The picture is not graphic at all. This is what reality looks lik e and it is what you see when you walk through a cancer ward. People that were o nce so vibrant reduced to shells of themselves. An accurate depiction of the tru th. The graphics are a great idea, the price of cigarettes should rise to make i t unaffordable(including on Indian Reserves) and insurance premiums should incre ase for people who choose not to look after themselves.

I agree that it has to b ea self motivated cessation, however, now more than ever, there are so many aid s, medications, organizations that can help stop any addiction known to man. で the past five years I have noted a significant decrease of smokers. Smoking and all addictions are a choice.
If people chose to look after themselves, healthcare would not have the depth of burdens that it has today.

Here's a better thought
@Here's a thought, nice to s ee the last horse has crossed the finish line. Actually the reality is that it i s more difficult and expensive for a smoker to get life insurance.

By that logic , Fat people should have to pay more, since they use more water, more air and mo re space than most of us… once this hot topic dies off, you do know you're next!?

Lou
What a waste of money. We smokers don't read the package inserts or look at the pictures. We like what is inside. 区 ess what, a lot of my friends with “perfect” lifestyles have died! Living causes death.Mind your own busines 秒

Kayla in Kingston
I'ma smoker, and those images on the packages do nothing for me. 私はちょうど take the cigarette out and put the pack back in my pocket.I'm very educated, know it's bad for me, but I jus t decide to quit smoking.They shouldn't waste any money on those labels, because I know from m yself and through friends that it will have absolutely no effect.

Marge
oh my go d people, my mother smoked for 30 some odd years of her life and she passed away from breast cancer! Life style choices and stress is what causes cancer. And wi th all the money that is given to cancer 'research' why isn't there a cure yet? because there is too much money to be lost if it's found that's the cold hard truth. People who smoke already know the dangers, the health risks, the cost, the consequences but what about the people who overeat? they are are putti ng themselves at risk too but noone says anything to them or makes them eat 50ft 。 from any entrance. There is better ways for money to be spent than to be putti ng pictures on cigarette packages, like putting criminals in jail and pedophiles to an electric chair! I pray for this generation and hope that the future bring s smarter people into power that can stop the truly evil things. Let the poor wo man who is on that cigarette pack rest in peace and don't splatter images like that, it's just sick.

Frank 民主党
It amazes me how the goverment treats adults like children when it comes to sm oking…….and children like adults, in the sence that children can indulge in all the diabetic, artery cloggin g, sodium filled fast food they want! …..with absolutley no warnings or graphic pictures on th e fast food bags what so ever!

mark
As a medical professional, encouraging peopl e to quit smoking is a priority. The focus now is not to look at one, 5, or ten unsuccessful attempts at quitting as failures – they are NOT. Smoking is a chronic addiction a nd as such it might take 15 attempts before you finally kick the habit – but we encourage you to keep trying until you are successful. You CAN do it!

survivor,not the realit y show
I count my blessings for never being tempted to light up.From the 1st time as far back as I can remember(our station wagon with an 8 track player and the windows rolled up),the headaches,blurred vision and stinky clothing was enough c onvincing as a no brainer.

Sal
Smokers are “out on the street” so the rest of us don't have to breathe in cancer causing a ir!Smoking will never be banded as politicians smoke. Let's just minimize the effects on other s, and realize that is will always be with us. Stop using money that can go to t he homeless shelters, abused women shelters, child care etc. instead of making m ore graphic cigarette covers that does not deter anyone.

lola69
My mother has sm oked for close to 50 years, these warnings do absolutely nothing to deter her fr om smoking, she even comments on them while she's smoking. Her mother was diagnosed with lung cancer (survived it) and that didn't make her stop either. I've never smoked and never will. The stench is w hat turns me off of it, not the warnings.

MikefromQuebec
You can put these pictu res on the packages all you want and it won't stop people from smoking. I never looked at the package when I used to smoke. I quit because I thought it might help me feel bet ter. In actaul fact all I did was gain weight and get high blood pressure. Not s ure whether I'd rather die of cancer of a heart attack, although the heart attack would probab ly be quicker and less messy. If the government seriously wants the citizenry to quit, stop selling them, make them illegal. We all know they're harmful so only an idiot woul d disagree with a law banning cigarettes in this country. Idiots, we can put in institutions to keep them from harming themselves. Pretty simple solution don't you think.

Ke ith
Non Smokers that blame Smokers for all these problems, need to take a look at the big picture of the smoking issue and put the blame where it needs to be. 私は have believed for years that the chemicals that they add to tobbacco, is the rea son why it is so addictive. The addictiveness is the number one reason why peopl e can't quit. Back in the 1ᙶ′s to the 1970′s, the Government was heavly invovled in supplying grants to Tobbacco Farmers and possibly research for the tobbacco companies. The Government has started th is problem and they need to force the tobacco companies to remove all chemicals from tobacco products, if they are serious about helping people quit. I hope tha t your reseachers at ctv will help me prove this matter and we can get to the he art of the problem to start helping people quit smoking. These adds on the carto ns and packages do nothing to make anyone quit and they are a waste of tax payer s money.

Goldens
すばらしい！ Long over due! If it stops one person from becoming a candidate for the cover of next cigarette package the graphics were well worth it. If smokers want to bury their head in the sand and ignore the adds それが彼らの選択です。 It is the youth who may never start smoking because of thi s campaign that makes the graphics worth while.

して、Dave
What are you so affraid of 2012 is just around the corner now, remember the world is going to end anyway

G od help me to quit!
@Paul, sorry but Jesus isn't going to hold people out of heaven if they acc ept Him and want to be saved. As people draw close to Him they will want to quit smoking but to say they are destined to hell is “religious” and “legalistic” and that isn't Jesus's message. Christian compassion and mercy always triumphs over “religious” judgment.

MJ
And y ou want to know where the money goes????

Teen Perspective
I think the root of th e problem are the young teens in high school that pick up the smoking habit. I a m a grade 12 student (never smoked) and each year the number of high school stud ents I see smoking has increased. I think the government should focus on teens t hat smoke. They should tighten up rules and laws and make sure minors can't get their hands on cigarettes. These 14 and 15 year old teens who start to smoke don't fully understand the cons equences that come with it. More effort should be put in preventing distribution of cigarettes to minors. That way when they are older and their brain is fully developed then they can make the decision to smoke or not, rather than getting a ddicted to them at the age of 14.

Nikki
Dooley and others that think this is a “sin” tax…get real….The taxes you are paying are thankful ly being put into the system which helps pay for the healthcare that all you smo kers are using up! And I know! I do surgery everyday. This includes surgery for smoking related illnesses..but not to mention the complex care that we give to p atients that cannot recover from everyday procedures because their lungs cannot handle the anesthetic, or all the medication we give to vascular patients becaus e of all the junk lining your arteries….You did it to yourselves…if you don't want the tax…perhaps we should make you all pay for your o wn health care bills.

Freed
“Smoke Suckers” …. think about that a while. How unnatural to suck smoke carrying 4000 toxins into your lungs and body then eventually die from it? Please quit people. You wi ll be so glad you did.

Been there done that.
Smokers cannot “TRY” to quit they must psyche themselves up the n decide to become a “NON SMOKER”. I quit cold turkey in 1984 after smoking 11/2 packs a day for almost ǲ y ears. It was the best decision I ever made and I am so glad I did. Smoking today is socially unacceptable and a serious health risk. I encourage any smoker who wants to quit to decide to do it and then “JUST DO IT”.

Gail
You know if my mother put a picture of me like this out to the world, I would come back from the dead and smack her upside the head.

dsm
give me a break people, alcohol does not kill, only if it is abused (l ike the drinking and driving etc)candy does not make obese people, moderation pe ople moderation, but you smoke you smoke and nothing, even moderation isnt going to help you.

charlie
you can put whatever you want on the outside. It's the inside of the pac kage smokers are going for. Try spending more money on quit programs, not advert ising.

Inversity
Are these new laws applicable to all tobacco products sold anyw here in this country? What about tobacco products sold on aboriginal reserves? W ill they be subject to the same rules (as far as warnings on packaging)? That ha s been a problem, as many aborigninal people feel like they are not subject to t he laws of Canada, as their treaty rights give them the right to “self-government”, and that includes the ri ght to sell tobacco products to anyone, at a price to be determined by the abori ginals, themselves, and in whatever packaging they determine. There is no mentio n in the article about this issue.

Sara
It's nice that your taking all these intiatives to mak e people live longer. The problem here – now that they are living longer they have no resource s and healthcare programs in place to look after all these people. You live long er so you can be stuck in old age homes away from the rest of the world in poor conditions with poor health care. Oh Joy!! There is no quality of life left once you get to that point. I would rather die in my own home happy when I can no lo nger have a good quality of life than be kept alive for years staring at four wa lls day in and day out in a nursing home. Put the money where it is really neede 民主党 You can't look after the elderly in this country properly now. God help them all in the nex t 20 years when that situation will be even worse – not just here but on a world wide scale.

MaryT
I agree completely with Mae in Ontario comments. The anti smoking campaigns and pressures of the past 10 years about people smoking is like a witch hunt fr om the 16th century. I can't think of anyone who doesnt know that smoking is not good for you and its possible to die from it, the same asyou can die far more often from alco hol and drug problems. Yet the govt. do nothing about that because they make too much money. The govt. want you to know by their pressures about smoking that th ey are interested in your health. They are interested in looking good. They alre ady have harped on and on and on for years about smoking. Put the money on somet hing that will get more effect. Enough has been done about smoking. Do something about alcohol and drug addicts to save their lives and everybody affected by it where it would do more good and help more people.

Chris – Moncton
OMG Smoking is Bad for Me!! ！ I didn't know! Come on people the images on the packages do nothing but start conversations among smokers huddled together for warmth in the cold winter. I quit smoking a year ago and I did it so that I would live to watch my 2 year old grow up, not b ecause the warning labels scared me. Rather than increasing the amount of money spent on packaging, reduce it, make them soft packs rather than cardboard and us e unbleached uncoloured paper with simply the Brand Name and “flavour”. So rather than a colourful pack it i s simply a plain brown wrapper around the cigarettes, that will reduce the envir onmental impact of all the discarded packages and further make branding and prom oting any particular company that much more difficult.

Here's a thought
Here's a thought deny them any sort of life insurance , insurance companies deny children with cancer, Autism down s yndrome things that are completely out of their hands, but a smoker can get cove red no problem.

Patrick
I wonder when these warning are going to start appearing on contraband cigarettes.Over 80% of YOUTHS who smoke buy illegal cigarettes!!! Where's the real problem in this society?As for the health care cost associated to smoking, o ur governments are racking in over 8BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR with tobacco, so us s mokers are footing the bill. As for healthcare costs associated to car/industry pollution, over eaters, fat foods……….well, nough said. Oh yeah, yes I smoke, and I ENJOY it!

カレン
Total waste of money. T he govt. is blind and stupid for spending money on labels. ARe they totally blin d and stupid? Must be. People stop when they want to stop. What they need to do is something about all the alcohol problems have around us which is far more sev ere than smoking can ever be. People lose their jobs,their families,their health , their self respect, and worst their soul. Of course, the govt. has reason to l et it continue. They make tons of money on alcohol and don't want to give that up. They need t o do start with campaigns like they do for smoking and give up harping on smokin gの I dont smoke or drink. Of course you can die from many other things.

kevcor0 5
Why not put this money to graphic labels on alcohol. It's a legal addiction that kills too. 私は think this is a waste of money considering Ȓ% of packaging already warns, disp lays are no longer visible, etc. Kids can get alcohol the same as they get cigar rettes!

KC Bby
In 100 years from now every single human being alive today and po sting their thoughts here will be dead. I think all this talk about dying premat urely gives some people the sense of imortality. it doesnt matter if you jog eve ryday or eat two heapings spoon fulls of cod liver oil you have an expiration da te. There is a tree growing in the forest right this moment with your name on it 。 It will be cut down and used to build your coffin. It is great that some of yo u will enjoy an additional 2 or even 20 more summers than the smokers but on au niversal scale its really insignificant. Your time on this earth will be forgott en.

Esteban
@JohnInMtl…
Yes, info found via google & the internet make everything you read true. Carry on with your research, grasshopper.

conductor274
These labels won't do a dam thing to prevent smoking because the government has no credibility on the subject of drug abuse. They hav e lied for over 30 years about the harmful effects of marijuana to 3-4 generatio ns of kids telling them it's a gateway drug to the most serious drugs like heroin, cocaine, cr ystal meth, etc. When the kids try pot the majority of them never try the harder drugs but they do drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes. The governments regulate, sell and profit from the sale of alcohol and tobacco. Those two cause the most damage to people than any other drug on the black market. So if tobacco is so ha rmful why doesn't the government make that illegal? Answer is the same reason they condone the tar sands in Alberta. The almighty dollar. Hypocrites. それらのすべて。

MARG MM
I'm not so sure t hat warning labels will stop heavy smokers, but at least they won't cost the taxpayers any mon ey. I guess if it stops some, then it is a good thing. Maybe telling smokers tha t they stink badly, and that they age and wrinkle much faster, would do the tric kの Those that call on banning cigarettes are likely the same people that would w hine and complain that the Government is being “dictitorial”, as the usual Harper haters constantly do. Smok ing is a filthy habit, which I once indulged in, but gave it up many years ago. My husband also gave it up many years ago, but that didn't stop him from getting bladder cance r, which the Dr said was caused by smoking. Fortunatly his treatments worked.

F lairCornwall
wow more pictures on packages.
who actually even looks at those cover s ??
our native American friends love to sell illegal contraband products to stup id canadiens and there is no pictures on there packages !!
keep on smoking peeple and throwing your leftover garbage on the street and parking lots…
only a matter of time befor e wii see your funeral going down the street!
HAPPY New Year suckers …keep on sucking on that t hing !!

ポール
It seems smoking is everywhere now, even in churches and it should not be. For non-christians you will probably not be interested in further readin gの In the book of Revelation 21:8 in the Bible we are warned that no sorcerer wi ll enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Well the word “sorcerer” is actually Pharmakos which mean drug addict in the 元のギリシャ語の翻訳は麻薬中毒のための言葉聖書があったもともと英語に触法した。喫煙者は薬物nicotenに熱中している大腸菌自分自身、キリスト教を呼び出し、煙だから誰もが、もう一度考えてみて、あなたが魔術師。事から入手してください。タッチは、ではなく、扱うことが味が。

ドゥーリー
私は偽善を見つけるたびに、彼らは別の5％が、政府はさらに別の罪税を追加する（注95％はしなかった）終了発表ということです。
彼らは本当に私たち、または終了するかのCAを維持しながら、彼らは終了禁煙狂信者のための壮大な立っているグラブをshに？
ワンダー多くの低所得家庭や高齢者がフードバンクのbecauを使用する方法それ自体私たちはタバコに支払う異様な税金ですか？

ディックチャップマン
あなたがたは言うことができる喫煙者は、コメントを読んだときです！これらの広告は、ティーンエージャーはセリ考えさせる ously、どのような中毒に関係なく言う吸う！
私は、40年以上前の喫煙をやめるそれは私がいなかった場合、私は今日ここにいるかどうかも怪しいですノースダコタ州！
うまくいけば、いくつかの十代の若者たちが左右される可能性があります広告と誰かの人生で保存されます！

X線喫煙
私はsで最近驚いた喫煙者の肥満の人々の生活になるくらいが思っていたほど短縮されていない表示tatistics。生活の質にもほど良くはありません。
すべて言われていること、それはそれは違法とすべきではない、先住民の文化の一部です。同じことが行くマリファナの。違いは、一日されていることを伝統的なパック2の原住民は、希望uivalent式ではない今まで吸う。この強迫行動は現代の生活の傾向にある。 L IKEがVLTs。これは、エスケープフロームの検索では、すべて私たちが住んで、企業の世界だ
無料奴隷！（つまり、私たちのところで、ほとんどです）

PMCのnは᱑
お金がすべて実行されます。数百万ドルは、コルはどのようたばこの販売に接続されている税金から毎年ected？政府はayrollsを持っているpの。政府は、現金の多くを必要とします。フリックビックカメラ吸盤。人々はeasiている Lyさんを誤解させる。質問一つ一つ。そのtrueまたはfalseであることが証明されるまで。 Wisd オムと規律は、単なる愚か者は軽蔑するものです。

JohnInMtl
数字は何ですキラーワールドワイド？タバコ煙？間違った！薬物乱用？間違った！エイズ？間違った！ n アンバーの死因は、世界全体の大気汚染や空気に首相寄稿経口です llutionは、化石燃料車です。しかし、自動車は、否定論者はしようとする中毒誰か、そして/または、何かのせいにする。大気汚染などが白血病、さまざまな癌などの皮膚がんの病気や原因あらゆる種類の再spiratory どのような）で車向けシガーソケットのrette煙発生に関するすべての奇妙な確かに（世界気象の周りされていません。我々は薪ストーブが原因ではないを参照してくださいスモッグその年の冬（50〜6 0年前）の1000倍以上の木材および/または石炭燃焼のストーブの近くにあったしかし、および/または屋内駐車場地下鉄で。一つの重要なのstatのant -して喫煙は過去decad中に大幅に減少している間バッコロビイストはあなたが教えてくれません電子は、がんはまだ喫煙の減少を超える速度で増加している！戦争 Ningのステッカーはすべての新しい化石燃料車とガソリンに要求される必要があります現在よりも重く課税する必要があります。それは、自動車を手に入れる役立つはず- 電気またはいくつかの他の無公害車とボード。あなたは私を覚えているトンはoと一緒にガス分配システムを元の自動車メーカーだった正日生産。電気自動車はずっと前からそのスタイルにあった。ゼネラルモーターズもそれらをシャットダウンするには路面電車の会社を購入し、交換テリグマンを限り行って化石燃料バスとmways。（私を信じていないですか？Googleの"グレートアメリカン路面電車スキャンダル"）。

変化の風
まあ、リーズで彼らは、今回の俳優を使用していないトンものだった...冗談特にグラムについて調べる後 APHのカナダでの喫煙者の死亡について話している。

とき、彼らは上のラベルを配置しようとしているアルコールは、誰かが自分の車と目からスローされたときにどのように見えるかを示す歩道のEIRヘッドスキッド。

ディー
今私たちは恐ろしい自動車事故のパイを必要とするビールラベル、酒の瓶の家庭内暴力の写真は、脂肪質の子供の写真のOのctures n個のキャンディーバー、ポテトチップス、心臓発作の被害者のバッグに肥満の女性の写真ドーナツ袋、包丁セットに刺し傷の写真、gの写真を写真 iant土地はピザに悪いにきびを持つ人々の水のボトルのサイトを、写真フィルボックスとすべてが完璧になります。

して、Steve - Oの
ここでは斬新なアイデアはね...政府が本当に誠実なABOをされた場合ユタの人々は"突きから"なぜ彼らは違法なこと、完全にタバコを禁止するか？しかし、単にaddic他の同様なアルコールや宝くじ/ギャンブルなどtions、それはあまりにも彼らのために現金の牛の多くです。 smokほかあなたは、私が何を意味するか知っていればINGは、観客のコントロールが良い形することができます。

Stewie
人々はよ houldが尊厳で死ぬことを許可され、私が死にかけている人物の写真をcと思うアンサーは恥ずべきことである。私の母はアルツハイマー病の後の段階で、彼女は多くのトンとは異なる見ていない彼は癌で死にかけている写真の人物の写真。肺がんは、父を殺したトン49、それは過去35年間の喫煙から私を停止するには何もしなかった。かなりウェイスティン私たちの税金＆人々が尊厳のある金型を聞かせてgであった。アルコールは殺す＆人々の生活を破壊する。なぜある電子大酒を飲んで警告なし？

教授パイChartt
それをノック。知的absurdit この政府主導の"問題"のyおよび論理的な未熟さは全く哀れなままです。喫煙は法的致死習慣です完全に、yはpotentiallの。人々は目を吸うのは愚かな権利を有するどの滞在煙が負の健康に影響を与える点にのみ適用で他（の実習では、自分で車の中で、家庭での喫煙を意味する、または離れた建物から）パブリック/プライベートスペース/または他の大人と、と。ゼア EFORE、政府はこの問題についてなし道徳的権威を持っています。終了パーソナルプラグインふりをして rwise。

ピーター
私はそれ来てから良いを参照してくださいいくつかの幸せのためにそこlost.But私は家族のT arboxのが申し訳ないして、次のnow.Iビットのための物語を、このアイデアのように本当に素晴らしいidea.Iを押すと同じtoken.Congrats？私はdはそれはたばこをやめるにも多くの人々をプッシュすると思うòができます。

グレッグ-しるしや不思議な
完全にhardco 再グラフィックはマールボロマン...。

夜明け
彼らはアルコールに同じことを行う必要があります。私は個人的に知っている以上死亡しているなったり病気に喫煙すればよいし、飲んでからの人々。フェアは、公正...人々は、パック上に関係なくのいただきました！をするつもりです。

クリス
推測何人...喫煙が行われている千年！ Oooooo我々はすべて、現在教育を受けていると知っているタバコの不健全な副作用使用は... ooooooo、それは殺す... oooooo！ねえ、yaのため別のニュースフラッシュは...肥満がある大手cau、たばこの使用を置き換えそれ自体、北米で予防可能な死の。ああ、何...それらのラベルでは動きません、別の推測！！ですから、駄々をこねることができますし、必要なすべての文句を言うが、社会不適応を取得する場合あなたはあなたがいないそこで停止しますか.. あなたはalcolol業界は、次のハンマーします。あなたはハムします rを、食品業界を次の...社会主義は全体主義に次のステップです.. それはすべてのWi開始番目は、抗たばこ！！だから既にシャットダウンして、人々の権利を尊重する合法的喫煙を選択する...キーワードが eは合法的です！

スティーブンは、D見る
私は、x - smoker.Iも7月31日に終了した午前 2004。配達の間に私の手に多くの時間と運転手を利用しています、私はデていた 4と5パック日に私の習慣veloped。つまり、少なくとも2日あたり100から125タバコを見る私は、驚くべきことをsmoked.The 26歳の0は、私の妻が着用していない可能性があることですパッチは、それが私は場合、私は可能性がuを求め終了することを決めたときので、彼女の悪夢を与えたとしてそれ自体、それらをそのようにした。
私があまりにイギリスに飛んだとき私は、蜂がなかった2002年に住んで 2つ以上のhours.The飛行のための煙のないnが8と大変でしたが、私ができた job.Iは誇りに思っていたかと。だから私は前に私に再長いですが、私の摂取量を下げるためにしようとした私は、再び3パックを買っていたももっとを購入して設定alized。私は、このbを失っていた煙とattle。 7月にはその日、私はお金のために行くの借りして、見て、煙ていない食品。私の優先順位がなくなっていたと煙より重要であった。だから私は尋ねた私妻は私が彼女のパッチを使用することができれば。 22:00 7月31日に私は私の最後の煙に火をつけた。 A トン22:10私は突きや期間を分の休憩を与えた私の体を20とベッドを私が行っても前に配置atchをpの。 8月に私は[OK]を感じて目を覚ました1日、私が感じたのは海を可能 EAの煙が、それを制御することができた。昼では私が（私は第3のパッチを発見パッチ）が落ちていたので、私はそれらを必要としなかった。今6年6ヶ月後、私まだ喫煙しないでください。ラベルが大きくしてください...それはそれを行うことができます価値it.Iのです..ので、できることを。

ウィル
これらの lablesは絶対にダメです。あなたは、若者の喫煙についての何かをしたいですか？てみてください education instead of stupid photo scare tactics.

peter in BC
I've suggested in the past that t hey raise the minimum age for buying cigarettes by a year every year to help kee p the youths off cigarettes. But this idea has been met with anger by many reade rs. I'm curious this time around, if you click the “thumbs down” on my comment, please make a comment and let the readers know whether you are a smoker or not. Fact is, we can save billions in health ca re costs and save thousands of lives if we got rid of cigarettes. Each year, we can raise the minimum age making it harder and harder for our youths to get addi cted to cigarettes. And if you elected to smoke, even knowing the risks, you wou ld forfeit your health care rights. This is no different than your insurance com pany denying you coverage after you caused an accident because they realize that it was your fault and therefore, they won't cover your costs for the repairs. You accept this mentality from your insurance company, why can't we adopt it for the health care of those who choose to smoke? Feel free to “thumbs down” my comment, but please let us know if you are a smoker or not. 乾杯！

Will SL
These new cigarette health warnings seems somewhat redundant–after all, we've all known for nearly half a century that smoking causes cancer. Instead of wasting money on n ew warning labels, perhaps the government should invest in tattooing every newbo rn child with the words: “Health Canada advises that living will kill you.”

Ian Shaw
Advertising is premised creating desire for an item by presenting it in an attractive fashion. それは希望 make sense that presenting items in a repulsive manner would decrease our desir 大腸菌 Who would shop at a fruit store that sent out fliers showing rotten fruit swa rming with maggots? Keep up the good work and encourage people to quit smoking. The graphics finally got to me and I quit 8 years ago after smoking for 37 years 。

Syl
A good idea in that it MAY help to keep young people from ever starting to smoke but I doubt if it will help anyone quite. Smoking is one of the most powe rful adictions you can have. I think we put too much effort in trying to get peo ple to quit when all our effort should be to stop anyone from ever starting to s moke in the first place.

Rafael
to all who smoke cigarettes: I know you want to kill yourself but why you try to kill somebody else. People who not smoke and ar e close to smoke person get more poison then person who smoke.
So stop be a SELFI SH!!!

I can say that to people who drive after drinking alcohol. Do not drive af ter any of amount of alcohol – YOU DRINK YOU NOT DRIVE!!!

I am 29 years old man so please list en to me and be mature like I am!

Lorne
I am a smoker and agree – smoking is no good for you.I quit for six months and gained 55 pounds – so I had my choice – get obese or quit smoking. Either way, I sh ortened my life.One solution – ban cigarettes in the country. Then raise the GST to cover the money shortfall from the hidden tax and make every Canadian pay their fair shair e of taxes, to cover all our social programs. Eliminate grants to all groups tha t lobby against smoking. These groups will not be needed. Use that monies toward s other programs that help Canadians – reduction of harmful emissions, etc.We will then see ho w these people will react to higher taxes, etc.

CSD
Now the government needs to start making beer, wine, liquor producers to start putting warning labels on the ir products. Alcohol cost more to the health care system than tobacco produces, plus the extra cost to the justice system, the insurance companies(which affects use who drive).

Toronto
If smoking is wrong I dont want to be right.

ジム
So….where's the grossed out accide nt lables on booze bottles or cases…((of course drinking has never hurt anyone))….Oh yes I almost forgot, po liticians love to drink……

danR
Shock ads are shocking only to upwardly mobile types who wind up in governmen t bureaucracies and journalism desks.

Cigs will always appeal to a huge preponde rance of teens who aren't going anywhere socially or financially. I'm sorry to shock you, but it goes someth ing like this:

Ahh! I'm gonna DIE! I'm gonna be Barb Tarbox!! 助けて！助けて！ハ！ ha!. Pass me another cigarette , Joe!

The bigger the ad, the funnier.

The way to shock them is to tell them the y will wind up being uncool: just like their PARENTS. But the college-educated f lacks who engineer these 'shock' approaches don't understand the mentality of the non-upwardly mobile.

Sorry guys, you jus t don't get it.

ブライアン
We need huge billboards carrying these pictorials on the roadways that e nter every community where tobacco sales are a significant draw.

Susan Fairbair n
It's like the taxes that have been put on tobacco products. It isn't going matter what is put on cigarette packaging. There are going to be people who will choose to buy and smoke tobacco products, including children. Banning tobacco products isn't going do the trick either – some smokers are g oing to smoke no matter what. Neither has education.

Dan in Quebec
@LorraineH Qu ebec now pays for 3 VIF's because the people pushing for it (lobbying) were high profile frien ds of the prime minister of Quebec (Julie Schneider, Celine Dion and Pierre Karl Peladeau) . This province will never get it right!

ゲーリー
Why not take some of th e taxes off gasoline and add them to cigarettes?

Dan in Quebec
Make sure “NATIVE” cigarettes are also includ ed in this target campaign!

Marg S
Cigarettes are taxed before sale to the publi c and then taxed again at point of sale. The drugs purchased over the counter to assist in quiting are taxed. NOW, drugs are illegal, but both prescription and illegal drug users can get rehab to quit their habit numerous times at the expen se of the public taxpayer, while no money is collected on these products, except for the pharmaceutical manufacturers and retailers for prescriptions. WHY are c igarettes legal and highly taxed but the smokers unable to get into rehab to qui t and get good counselling since staying at home and quitting on one's own is impossible. Chil dren still suffer in second hand smoke in the home and in the car as parents don't always smok e outside and in the car when the children are not in it. Medical marijuana can be smoked in rental units but not ordinary cigarettes, the fumes enter the hallw ays and other apartments where there are children and people with medical proble ms. When the marijuana users move the units do not get fumigated to the point of replacing the walls, ceilings and floors that have absorbed the smoke. There is something dangerously wrong with government thinking, they want the money from taxes and can do so legally with the cigarette smoker but flatly refuse to assis t them to quit and they are the cause of the problem by not making it illegal. T obacco used in native ceremonies should be accounted for and not sold to the peo ple for personal use. This is their culture and should be respected. Then all of the Canadian population would be equal.

dsm
you know to me any graphic packagin g will not stop the smokers, they are addicted and looking at a picture on packa ges wont change their mind.smoking is the most digusting habit, if the smokers o nly knew how bad they smell, but i guess even that doesnt matter, probably have to die to the point, oh then its too late. wake up smokers, why do you think its banned in all public places now.

bikerborz
I smoked for 20 years, and am now al most 5 years quit. During the time I was smoking, the gov't INTRODUCED these graphic warning p ackages. We smokers just tuned 'em out. It doesn't have any effect whatsoever. The gov't should save its money and just co llect the taxes. On the subject of how to get people to quit, a person has to WA NT to quit, and no gov't is going to easily change a person's mind.

Gummiente
@DJKoop: Make cigarettes illeg al and thereby force people to quit…. uh, yeah. That'll work. Just like it did for marijuana and other drugs 。 Hellooooooo…?

Slewhigh Yendick
The government is in total control of this product.. They dec ide at any time to change the label ,, and yet they simoly CANNOT label our food s that containn genetically modified organisms !!!!..Has Obama quit smoking yet? ？

I Wonder
This is just a waste of tax dollars, if this much effort was put into curing drug addicts that would be more commendable.Smokers have lost ALL their constitutional rights YET pot smokers can light up anywhere it seems.IF tobacco is as bad as the lobbyists try and tell us then get the manufacturers to remove the deadly contents of their product.Personally I don't believe any of the claims due to the f act that many members of my family smoked for years and all died of old age with no signs of cancer or breathing issues!!!!!!!!!!Find something else to lobby ab out and leave peoples personal life choices alone.Smoking doesn't kill BUT drugs sure do!!!

L orraineH
In Quebec the government has found millions of dollars to help women get pregnant through IVF at $15,000 a try and will pay for 3 tries. This is for all Quebec women regardless of their financial status.

Why don't they find some money to set up f ree bilingual smoke cessation clinics where smokers could get help with their ad diction along with the tools necessary, ie Nicorettes, patches, etc. to help t hem stop.

Smokers can be a drain on Medicare as are those who live unhealthy lif e-styles and suffer from, among other things, obesity, high blood pressure, diab etes, high cholesterol, heart problems, etc. but, with holier than thou attitude s, don't smoke so feel quite righteous.

Additionally, cigarettes are a cash cow and continue t o generate a lot of tax money which the Government is unwilling to give up.

As f or banning smoking, prohibition didn't work so well in the US except for the money made by Can adian Whiskey Barons who continued, throughout Prohibition, to provide Americans with their drink of choice. This time the Americans would be the beneficiaries as cheaper cigarettes would follow the same route as illegal whiskey did and we would be greatly helping their economy.

Our Government has no intention of banni ng smoking – they really want to continue increasing the price of legal cigarettes and stop th e sale of illegal cigarettes. This would not be for the good of the smoker, but because they are not generating any tax money on illegal cigarettes.

River
Compa re the addiction to that of a dehydrated person with a glass of water just out o f their reach.

David Siemens
Fighting tobacco use is like trench warfare in WW1. Back and forth goes the battle with thousands dead after each attack. たばこ smoking is lethal, deadly, toxic, destructive and those that smoke are continua lly impaired. The anti-smoking campaign is the greatest single achievment of our society in the past Ȓ years.What part of the tobacco industry do you want to p rotect, and why?

Anthony
An unending cigarette label soup opera, that has been going on for decades, using taxpayers money. If nothing else, it keeps politicians busy to justify their large salaries and even larger pensions. これは would have been far easier, had they made production and sale of cigarettes ille gal in Canada, but do not forget – collecting all those taxes must have put a grin on any seas oned bureaucrat's face.

Dixie from Alberta
This product kills. Plain & simple. Its a dirty disgusting habit so why is it still on shelves? Subsidize farmers to get out of producing tobacco a nd change to a more life friendly product.

KC Bby
It's your friends that will get you addicted to substances. The addiction rarely comes from some sleazy death merchant at a corner store. And speaking of sleaze, why does London Drugs peddle prescription medication on one side of their store and on the other side they sell cigarettes ？

Reece
@Romz – - “What confuses me is why doesn't government just ban smoking altogether? If its so harmful and a leading cause of death. If the goal is to prevent smoking why not eliminate it all toge ther?” – - – I reside in Vancouver and Mexico. Would you like to know what its like to live under the consequences of proh ibition? Go visit Ciudad Juarez for just a day. The war on drugs is a complete f ailure and everybody from the president on down to the freshly minted lawyer are all aware of the complete destruction of law and order. Everybody pretends that there is a plausible belief that the war will come to an end and there will be a victory celebration down main street. We all realize that making anything ille gal only creates wealth for the terrorists, cartels, lawyers, etc. Maybe you liv e on a white picket fenced suite and walk to work at the ice cream shop everyday 。 En route to your shop you say hello to Andy, Opie and lets not forget Deputy B arney Fife….oh, what a character he is aint he?? My question to you is simple: Why do you want armegeddon to come to your village? Didnt you enjoy the machine gun battles of Ciudad Juarez? Oh yeah, you dont get to experience that in Mayberry. So, to answ er your question, the reason that govts dont ban such a harmful product is becau se they dont want you to die from second hand bullets.

B. Kelley, Ontario
I'm not a smoker so I think that I'm reasonably objective when I say that the Anti-smoking groups are really “anti-smoker”. People who smoke h ave been marginalized, isolated, condemned, banned to the street, legislated, ta xed and punished under the banner of protecting health. In Ontario, they're not even allowed t o have a roof over their heads when they go outside to smoke. Allowing them a li ttle creature comfort apparently might encourage their disgusting habit. Smokers are not criminals, they are victims of an insidious industry that managed to ge t them hooked on a poisonous product. If we treated drug addicts, alcoholics or people with AIDS in the same manner then the human rights advocates would justif iably be screaming bloody murder. Nicotine addiction is not a character flaw. これは is a physical and mental addiction every bit as real as an addiction to heroin and just as difficult to overcome. Instead of printing stupid pictures on packag es and punishing smokers with crippling taxes, our governments should be offerin g real help to quit by providing proven effective smoking cessation products and extensive support programs at no cost. The punitive approach is not only ineffe ctive, it is inhumane. There seems to be plenty of money to bail out tobacco far mers who have been complicit in supplying their poison to the market so how abou t a few dollars and a little compassion to provide real help to their victims?

Amir
maybe the federal governement should stop being hypocrite and ban sale of so cially acceptable drugs like tobacco,alcohol,pain killers,prosac etc

Norm Winni peg
Maybe the government should introduce “Cigarette Registration”. They kill more people than guns. (just ta kes longer) All users must be registered and show a photo ID card to obtain a pack. Based on an annual physical, Smoker's Permits could be revoked. It is a federal offense for me to hand my gun to a non licensed person. Apply the same to smokers! Or ju st ban them completely.

Intelligent Liberal
Kids laugh at the warnings and think they are cool. Worst thing is the government plans to put the picture of a dece ased anti-smoking advocate. How would she feel about having her face on packs of smokes all over the country? What a terrible idea, kids will make fun of her. T he government is clueless on this negative-advertising issue, they should stick to what they are good at, bashing the opposition leader.

Wojtek
e-cigarettes are the answer here folks. I successfully quit smoking using those things, and stop ped using e-cis as well. 1yr on Jan 4th. The gov could of looked into getting re sale rights for ecigs and making their own e-liquid. They collect the tax on it, you use a product that you can trust more then china-branded liquids, and you s top smoking those cancer sticks. Everyone wins.

Franco
Anything that helps to st op people from smoking is a good idea. Anyone defending the right to smoke is ju st nuts. Maybe the Gov should just ban it since most people do not smoke anyway and would stop any new smokers.

Simon Blastock
First of all, I am a smoker and i n agreement with others, a bigger warning is not going to change my choice to sm oke or not, really I have read the so-called effects of smoking and have them me morized by now. There are people dying of cancer everywhere and the government s ays smoking is to blame. However that is only part of it…How many automobiles are on the road, roughly 10 million in Canada? Do people not think that all the toxins a gasolin e/diesel engine spews out has something to do with this? Wake up people and star t thinking.

jane22
i think everyone is just wasteing there time the goverment is never going to make cigarette's illegal they make way to much money besides whats the point i ts not going to stop people from smoking . weeds illegal but that doesnt stop pe ople from smokeing that now does it .. so i think they should make new lables be cause if they cant stop people from doing it they might aswell make everyone awa re of the Consequences that you risk by smokeing .

RK in MB
Did no one in the go vernment think that all this publicity both positive and negative might push smo kers to buy contraband smokes because they're cheaper? If the government wanted to spend wisel y they would study the ecigarette and approve it so us smokers could get our fix but be healthier. Of course that would mean reduced tax money which obviously c an't be tolerated. What do you call someone who acts like they are looking out for you but rea lly aren't? Snake oil salesman, schister? I'm not sure but as long as the government keeps allowing cigarett es to be sold the anti-smokers should be complaining ABOUT the government, not t それらのO！喫煙と訴は、喫煙だけ大きなビジネスです。タバコcompan 新設は、莫大な利益を、私は私がタバコを支払う余分な税金を作るに行く他のグループの間で補助金として反喫煙グループ。たぶん政府は来ることができる喫煙者の交流と$ 3億ドルは、経済を刺激する。これは、wor必要があります kは同じように、他のいくつかのアイデアとしてオタワの出てくる。

romz
何がconfu SESは私です...。なぜ政府は、すべて一緒に喫煙を禁止するのですか？場合は、そのようと死の主要な原因...有害な目標はなぜnを喫煙を防止するためにされている場合すべて一緒にそれを排除otの？の代わりにcの大きくて良い写真を入れて igaretteパック-それは、これらは、タバコ購入しかし、あなたはfrを死ぬことを覚えて言っているようだそれは、私たちはお金を稼ぐ...このjはしかし、私にだけ午前に役立ちますので、オムは、私たちはあなたにそれを販売しますが、 USTは何の意味もないように見えます。

マイクはマクドナルド-ウィニペグ
新しい警告がnothi行います開始からの若者を停止するには影。 12子供たちは - 16年齢（覚えて無敵ですあなたがその年齢されたとき？）、おそらく、新しいパックのキックを得ることになります。ザ大多数の'古い'喫煙者は、自分自身のように、それをお楽しみください。はい、私はそれを認める！私はそれをお楽しみください！人advocaものとしてはあなたが'禁止'を言うことができる、タバコ製品の禁止のTE？私は、あなたが知っていた。ばかげた計画。何をする必要があります完了は、これらの新しい警告に政府が入れているすべてのお金を取ることです中古代ターゲット私たちの学校での、資金教育プログラム。

マイク
とき彼らは車の側面にあるラベルを配置し、警告する人々をharmfについてつもりですから車煙は、UL、排気やアルコールの後の数年間肝someonesの乱用やアルコールと障害dはリヴィング事故現場のボトル一人一人に、またはpictu 石炭焚き水力発電所から空の周りのリングの再は、私たち全員が使用しますか。私は tはだから大半は、喫煙、虐待すべての人にジャンプします。停止するには、少数のピッキングとの聞かせてラベルとそれらのすべてについてのハープ！

キースフィッシャー
私の質問：何かを証明番目ですこれらのグラフィック警告で喫煙者の中毒率に効果がありますか？私は、ベイを思う、それはとにかく購入者が"アウト調整"される最初のショックの値をオンド。次は何、ワインは、お酒（肝硬変肝臓と致命的な自動車事故のすべてのアルコールfは、彼らが行くの投稿写真oを容器＆ビール）？ gov'tsは建設abou tを積極的にお金を多く作るも何かを行うには上のすべてのこれらの製品。

ビルシックスティ
@ DJKoop
知事が`tでありません`tはあなたがsmoking.Theyだけワンを停止するあなたは喫煙場所を起動したときと何が喫煙を制御するトン。することができます`あなたはだがT そのような違法タバコをmoking彼らは決して義務の支払いに税金を徴収トン`勝ったため、電子タバコのパッケージに偽善的なメッセージを表示します。

オンタリオ州のメイ
それは私を笑わせてくれる彼らは多くの死者は、喫煙によって引き起こされた方法を提供する。どれだけ彼らがthaのを知っていますかトン喫煙が原因でしたか？point.My夫のケースは、すべての彼の人生アレルギーがあった。私は彼があまりにも喘息を持っていたが、それを知らなかったと確信しています。彼は20年前に喫煙を終了します。私の息子はあまりにも多分あなたが言うことができる喘息を持って受動喫煙から、しかし、どのように私の孫が人になることがないことを説明しない喫煙にさらさバスもそれを持っています。いずれかの息子や夫は、彼らが数えられる死亡した場合、私はきっと喫煙deaths.My隣人として、mは、大規模な心臓発作で死亡。彼がされていた喫煙は終了します。彼の息子が39でも大規模な心臓発作で死亡した。剖検それは遺伝性疾患であると言いました。私はだ私が説明するように分類したに違いない、これらは喫煙による死亡too.The真理が、しばらくの間あなたのために悪い喫煙はdeatいくつかの貢献原因で可能性がありますが hsは、彼らが喫煙者の死亡の正確な原因がわからない。また、該当する場合、そのあなたはそれは、喫煙による死亡として分類される喫煙があります。私の近所の人や彼の息子の時間か私の隣人は、喫煙歴のない場合はaveのは長く住んでいた。私はそうは思わない

ケン
政府のショーを持っていくつかの生殖腺と税金のストップ売り奴ら。ちぇっ我々は愚かなことですか？

ジャックVervil ル
私はアルバータ州政府は、今のところ大きなタバコ会社を訴えていることを確認 10000000。彼らは、制定された、屋内の喫煙禁止をタバコ広告を禁止する法律を可決したパッケージと政府のたばこ貼付健康警告ラベルは、タバコが短所は税金を引き上げたistently。私は喫煙者と看護師は、私の妻は5年前に終了します。彼女はリットルとしてwelの看護師だと、その喫煙家に帰ってくる少なくとも別の私に言って月に三回時代の40年で死亡した。か、それを完全に禁止する柱STの政府は、私が希望する場合は、サポートフルインチどのようにして、喫煙者に提供するか、それらをより充電し、医療費のためにそれらを行う企業を訴える。それは私達に人を殺してよ！

サンドラ
私はので、政府の疲れて顧客に負担を入れています... ...彼らは、b awarnessにもっとお金を費やす非常に予防に少しutの。政府は、化学薬品やtrのと法律を行います ANSは脂肪が、いくつかの理由で、彼らはタバコのために法律を作るしません... ... cigarettsが原因で肺癌だけでなく、トン彼は上記の...この政府は、彼らの製造をシャットダウンすることを拒否知る収入を失うことになる... ...どのように偽善的なことです！！あなたはパッケージにこれらの写真をpuに...あなただけトンを駆動するために行く裾はpackagaing 7百万円の支出のreserve.Insteadから購入して、なぜ意志がないことは、t過ごす serisouly終了する人々を支援することに彼はお金... ... ...私が言うシャットアップ製造業者ダウンとDONE付き... ...は、短所を責める止められ umer ...。 PS私は喫煙者です

アンwを
どのような時間とお金の無駄。煙はだビューから隠れているあなたがそれらを購入するまでも警告を見ることができないòができます。彼らはまた、cigaretを作るつもりです違法テことはありますか？

ロンドンのジョンオン
電気タバコ - 約1 / 3で定期的に車向けシガーソケットのコストたばこ - 任意の危険な癌induを除いて、外観と感じ、通常のタバコの提供物質をcing。きれいな水の蒸発コンビの電子タバコユーザー呼吸煙、tarや灰なくニコチンとネッド。それでも、カナダの私たちの健康を禁止当局は、箱に大きな画像は、納税者のお金の有効利用だと思います。

ドン
それは、人々がまだシベニク中止してくださいsmoke.Soしようとしているパッケージの上にあるものは重要ではありませんそれはNingの。

DJKoop
喫煙者を利用しています違法にカナダ製品自身はそれだけで作るそうではないことを私は喫煙をやめるつの質問をして、目的のPEオプレ彼らがいる場合悪いのはなぜ CEの誰もが終了するには？

RGBrook
これは、政府がカナダ人はWERのことに気づいたようだ en'tは、それらについては、ティ廃棄による納税者のお金の約4万ドルを無駄に受け入れるように禁煙、世界をSはインセンティブを認識した。これは、ほとんど禁煙に終止符を入れ、政府の責任を私たちののsu rfaceにすぎません。それでは、次のように望んでいる続きの問題 rabandタバコは予約で非先住民に売却はされてすぐに持って来られる n終わり。ファイン売り手とこれらの違法のバイヤーは、脱税のための煙。そして、あなたの政策にこれ以上のフリップフロップは、ハーパーをしてください。あなたが個人的に可能性があります ble、それを買う余裕が、カナダ人がすることはできません。